Jump to content

2022/2023: PL MD38 - Man Utd v Fulham


Recommended Posts

I would rest the players who are expected to play for the cup final. I think it's more important to keep playing players to keep momentum going when you're talking about weeks, but missing one game shouldn't be an issue.

We need to be as fresh as possible for the final to have any chance of winning it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Jay007 said:

I would rest the players who are expected to play for the cup final. I think it's more important to keep playing players to keep momentum going when you're talking about weeks, but missing one game shouldn't be an issue.

We need to be as fresh as possible for the final to have any chance of winning it.

Suspect we're going to be disappointed, and he'll go strong... but I'd go for something like this 

Garnacho Weghorst Elanga

Eriksen* McTominay Mainoo

Malacia Lindelof** Maguire Dalot

De Gea (meh)

*I wouldn't start him v city, but ETH will

** lack of CBs fit

That team would be vaguely competitive v fulham, and it would mean all but Lindelof and DDG from this xi would be rested: 

DDG; AWB, Varane, Lindelof, Shaw***; Casemiro, Fred, Bruno, Sancho, Martial, Rashford

*** If he's ok for the final

Fwiw I would actually consider playing mcfred and casemiro v city, bruno on the right since antony's out, and go full oleball with it but that's another debate

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, hdcantona said:

Suspect we're going to be disappointed, and he'll go strong... but I'd go for something like this 

Garnacho Weghorst Elanga

Eriksen* McTominay Mainoo

Malacia Lindelof** Maguire Dalot

De Gea (meh)

*I wouldn't start him v city, but ETH will

** lack of CBs fit

That team would be vaguely competitive v fulham, and it would mean all but Lindelof and DDG from this xi would be rested: 

DDG; AWB, Varane, Lindelof, Shaw***; Casemiro, Fred, Bruno, Sancho, Martial, Rashford

*** If he's ok for the final

Fwiw I would actually consider playing mcfred and casemiro v city, bruno on the right since antony's out, and go full oleball with it but that's another debate

 

Completely forgot pellistri was a thing, him over elanga

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dreadful markin from rashford, but ddg being shite aerially is why they even had the corner, absolute trash again 

Casemiro dreadful error, clear pen 

de gea so desperate to secure that bag he’s even managed to finally save a pen ffs

Other than the corner and pen errors we’ve played quite decently actually, just got to make the most of it

 

cant believe garnacho hit the bar there, we have had so many touches in their box 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, hdcantona said:

Pellistri superb, weghorst shows why he’s not gonna be staying 

Remember the good ol' days back in January...

You and @CB78 trying to convince yourselves that it was a sane move.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, hdcantona said:

It fulfilled its purpose tbf 

carthorse > ronaldo

Not really.

Ronaldo was gone before Weghorst was signed. They could have found a better loan option like Sabitzer for midfield.

It was cute seeing you guys hyping it. It was Burnley's fault for not using him right. Haha. Classic.

He'll probably score the winning goal next week to sign off.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, O said:

Not really.

Ronaldo was gone before Weghorst was signed. They could have found a better loan option like Sabitzer for midfield.

It was cute seeing you guys hyping it. It was Burnley's fault for not using him right. Haha. Classic.

He'll probably score the winning goal next week to sign off.

He was a bargain bin space filler, probably the best loan of all time 

Link to post
Share on other sites

People who are against ten hag will say it's a bad loan signing. The fact is we are third and in two cup finals. The totality of what has been achieved by the club since Christmas can therefore be construed as positive. Chelsea spent hundreds of millions in January and had no recognised striker whereas we brought one in for a few million of compensation who at least knew the role of cf. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, John Locke said:

People who are against ten hag will say it's a bad loan signing. The fact is we are third and in two cup finals. The totality of what has been achieved by the club since Christmas can therefore be construed as positive. Chelsea spent hundreds of millions in January and had no recognised striker whereas we brought one in for a few million of compensation who at least knew the role of cf. 

He scored zero PL goals. 2 goals from 30 appearances.

Pretty much every United fan recognises that Weghorst didn't work out. Even ten Hag's most devoted supporters.

He had a bit of cult following initially.

Chelsea did have a ST in Aubameyang. They simply discarded him after Tuchel was sacked.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 113 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

×
×
  • Create New...